Sidney School Board trustees read a draft Tuesday prepared by Superintendent of Schools Daniel Farr dealing with the issue of whether a student who breaks the alcohol/drug policy should be allowed to take part in graduation ceremonies.
Information in the draft contains that according to law, the graduation ceremony is a privilege, and trustees may deny a high school student the honor of participating in commencement.
The draft reads that because all students can’t serve a penalty in an approved form of activity suspension prior to graduation, school officials are considering a different punishment to be substituted.
|
|
In order to take part in the graduation ceremony, the student would need to complete a 10-hour program of self study, complete chemical assessment provided by the school, and the student and parent will have an exit interview.
The draft reads, “The above activities may only be substituted in the event that a student has no other means by which to serve the attendant suspension and apply to a student’s participation in the graduation ceremony only.”
Trustee Todd Hermanson stressed that a student will have the choice of doing the activities or not taking part in the graduation ceremony. The decision will be up to the student and the family.
The offense must take place prior to the student’s final day in school. If a student, however, is suspected of being intoxicated in the graduation line, a breathalyzer test will be conducted, and if the student was to have a positive reading, they would be denied participation in the ceremony.
Farr reminds the public this is only a draft, and school officials are open to suggestions. Parents are encouraged to stop in and speak with the superintendent or building principals about the draft policy.
In other business during Tuesday’s meeting:
• Athletic director Mike Gear spoke about the coaching evaluation form. In a mid-season evaluation, basketball players ranked coaching on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being the best on the various questions. Gear said all six basketball coaches had an overall score between 1.5 and 2.0.
“With all the kids in the program, there were no particular red flags,” Gear said.
A random group of parents also received the survey. In the future, however, all parents will have the opportunity to complete the evaluation.
Farr explained the whole process this year is refining. School officials are working to get the survey online so the community, especially parents, can take part. Although work still needs to be completed, the online survey will be up by the end of this school year.
“We will get this mission accomplished,” Farr said.
The goal of the evaluation tool is to improve communication between students, as well as the community, with school officials.
“This is not a witch hunt,” trustee Kelly Dey said. “It’s a way to get input from the community.”
Hermanson asked Gear if he feels the duties of activities director should be a full-time job.
Gear answered if the job is full time, the director could be more proactive rather than reactive.
Hermanson feels that if funds are available for a full-time activities director it would benefit students.
Gear noted the amount needed to fund activities keeps increasing. The ASB account used to have $50,000 in the spring and lately only has $27,000. Part of the problem is higher motel rates. Because of a lower amount of participants in middle school football, those students may need to travel for games some time in the future. If that happens, the middle school volleyball program will also travel for matches because of Title IX requirements.
editor@sidneyherald.com







Comments
Fairview Graduate wrote on Mar 19, 2010 7:43 PM:
Mel wrote on Mar 15, 2010 12:28 PM:
Our drinking policy was simply: if you got caught and proven to be drinking (not assumed) and participated in extra-curricular activities you were suspended from that activity for a pre-determined amount of time. This included after school hours but first and foremost you were held accountable by law. Law enforcement and judges were very agressive with their punishments on this matter.
While I see that our law enforcement is very proactive about handling the drinking here, I don't see our judges taking a stronger stance on it. This must be frustrating. In most instances a MIP first offense would result in probation with the option of deferrement after some very strict conditions were met: Had to attend school without absences or with a written doctor's excuse on file, community service, and strict curfew enforcement.
If it was during school activities then the school reported it to the law and you dealt with both consequences.
Growing up my biggest fear was my mom finding out I got caught drinking. I realize not all parents take underage drinking as seriously but I have to believe most of us do and will do the right thing by our kids.
If our judges would enforce stricter consequences, our law enforcement officers could feel more supported in their efforts, and schools would not need to feel the need to police it themselves so hard. And parents would hopefully be more proactive about discouraging it. "
Johnny Walker wrote on Mar 13, 2010 1:35 PM:
Native wrote on Mar 13, 2010 1:17 PM:
... wrote on Mar 13, 2010 12:56 PM:
Ditto wrote on Mar 13, 2010 11:43 AM:
Randy wrote on Mar 12, 2010 10:42 PM:
Just Remembering wrote on Mar 12, 2010 9:20 PM:
know the truth wrote on Mar 12, 2010 3:43 PM:
former teenager wrote on Mar 12, 2010 9:56 AM:
I have to say I do agree that the age for drinking, smoking, and legal "adulthood" should be the same. But they aren't, and until it changes students should face consequences for breaking the law. "
What Ever wrote on Mar 12, 2010 8:26 AM:
Randy wrote on Mar 11, 2010 11:24 PM:
"Get Real" - This is NOT about withholding the Diploma...It is about allowing the students to participate in the Graduation ceremony. "
Get Real wrote on Mar 11, 2010 4:12 PM:
former teenager wrote on Mar 11, 2010 10:51 AM:
I don't feel at all sorry for a minor who actually has to have (gasp) consequences for their actions.
And the "but things were different then" thing doesn't hold true with me--I haven't been out of high school that long. "
Native wrote on Mar 11, 2010 9:22 AM:
community member wrote on Mar 11, 2010 8:43 AM:
Native wrote on Mar 11, 2010 8:11 AM:
11 Bravo wrote on Mar 11, 2010 7:23 AM:
Memory Lane wrote on Mar 11, 2010 6:51 AM:
Memory Lane wrote on Mar 11, 2010 6:34 AM:
Problems wrote on Mar 11, 2010 4:55 AM:
I think any steps to kick Montana's drinking problem is a good thing. As already said, many times fines don't work for teens because parents pay and too many parents think it's ok to let Jr drink so parents don't punish, so punishment in a way it effects teens is a good thing (detentions, writing papers, taking away sports, etc).
My only complaint is the lack of unfairness with the school punishments. Not being in a game is not the same as not be able to be in the graduation ceremony. I'd suggest making the first punishment for an MIP the same for everyone, like detentions with a multi-page research paper about the dangers of drinking due at the end (and having to get a passing grade on the paper). Then, the 2+ MIP takes away sports and such (but not graduation). That way the kids that beat themselves up and learn from their mistakes don't get punished unfairly just because they play sports or not. "
Local Trucker wrote on Mar 10, 2010 9:48 PM:
Im not making excuses and i don't think they should drink till drinking age and yeah we all did stupid things.
But this article is what to do about it rather than seeing them in a accident the school is offering a solutions to try and keep someones teen daugher or teen son from doing the same things
this is all im saying on it "
Please wrote on Mar 10, 2010 8:17 PM:
Local Trucker wrote on Mar 10, 2010 11:26 AM:
It said
school officials are open to suggestions "
Nicole wrote on Mar 10, 2010 10:56 AM:
please wrote on Mar 10, 2010 10:13 AM:
Memory Lane wrote on Mar 10, 2010 8:43 AM:
Really wrote on Mar 10, 2010 8:29 AM:
Supporter wrote on Mar 10, 2010 8:27 AM:
thinking person wrote on Mar 10, 2010 7:09 AM:
community member wrote on Mar 10, 2010 6:52 AM:
... wrote on Mar 9, 2010 1:56 PM:
whoever wrote on Mar 9, 2010 8:45 AM:
Really wrote on Mar 9, 2010 7:18 AM:
David Larsen wrote on Mar 8, 2010 3:39 PM:
Randy wrote on Mar 5, 2010 11:07 PM: