Paulette Olesen,
Sheila’s mom
Sidney
This is the Sidney Herald and not the National Enquirer. Sidney is a small town and there are four children involved, the youngest only 7 and 9.
The court heard details leading up to the attempted murder of two good people, but they were not accurate. They were details described by Bob, the accused! The article had the point of view of Bob being the victim. Sheila divorced Bob over 15 months before this terrible incident happened. It was stated that Bob and Sheila did things together, which is true, but what was not stated was that they were only together when they went with their two sons.
|
|
When Bob broke into Sheila’s house, Mike did not have his shirt off. Bob stating this is just one of the ways he shows his lack of character. He was trying to justify his criminal act of trying to kill two innocent people by making it look like they were doing something wrong. Mike and Sheila were on a first date. They were both single people doing nothing wrong. Again, Sheila had divorced Bob over 15 months before this terrible incident happened. He continues to blame all of his problems on everyone but himself.
Big surprise, he got religion in jail. What else was there for him to do? The pastor, aka “Preacher in the Patch,” gave him sympathy and told Bob that he was not at fault which is exactly what he wanted to hear. A lot of people have had a bad childhood but went on to live their lives without trying to kill two good people.
Mike is a good man and Sheila’s dad and I are very glad he is with Sheila and her boys. There are false stories still going around, but the people who know and care about Sheila, Mike and her boys know it is just a bunch of “noise.”







Comments
ME wrote on Sep 15, 2010 4:41 AM:
... wrote on Sep 12, 2010 6:42 AM:
Wondering wrote on Sep 10, 2010 1:05 PM:
Thankful wrote on Sep 10, 2010 12:44 PM:
I believe what this letter was meant to do was to set some details straight. Paulette is only addressing what was already written about in the article regarding Bob's sentencing. I see absolutely no harm to the children by her clarifying some things that were previously written about. And I agree, the only people who know the whole truth are the three that were there that evening but as far as slamming a mother and grandmother for correcting something she thought was wrong is absurd! Anyone who knows this family (or the Escobedo family for that matter) knows who is more likely to be telling the truth!!!!! "
ME wrote on Sep 9, 2010 1:23 PM:
Lisa wrote on Sep 9, 2010 6:23 AM:
O wow. wrote on Sep 8, 2010 9:57 PM:
optional wrote on Sep 8, 2010 11:48 AM:
wondering wrote on Sep 7, 2010 10:25 AM:
thank you wrote on Sep 2, 2010 1:10 PM: